A Roth conversion can be useful, but it is not a stand-alone solution or an automatic tax win. For families with significant retirement assets, the real question is whether converting part of a traditional retirement account supports the broader plan for retirement income, taxes, charitable giving, estate planning, and the wealth they hope to pass on.
A conversion means moving assets from a traditional IRA or eligible employer retirement plan into a Roth IRA. The untaxed portion of the amount converted is generally included in taxable income for that year. In return, future Roth withdrawals may be tax-free if the applicable requirements are met.
That tradeoff can be worthwhile. However, it can also be expensive if it is approached as a one-time transaction rather than a coordinated planning decision.
Summary – Roth conversions can create greater flexibility in retirement and may reduce the tax burden on assets passed to heirs. But the upfront tax cost is only one part of the decision. A conversion can also affect future required distributions, Medicare premiums, charitable plans, estate strategies, and the income available to a surviving spouse. The most effective approach is usually not a one-time transaction, but a coordinated decision made within the context of a family’s full financial plan.
Why Affluent Families Consider Roth Conversions
Traditional retirement accounts generally allow taxes to be deferred until money is withdrawn. Roth IRAs work differently. The taxable portion of a conversion is generally included in income in the year of the conversion, while qualified Roth withdrawals in the future may be tax-free.
For the original account owner, Roth IRAs also do not require lifetime required minimum distributions, or RMDs. That distinction can create additional flexibility later in retirement.
The value of that flexibility depends on what the family is trying to accomplish.
Managing future required distributions
Large traditional retirement account balances can eventually create substantial RMDs, whether the household needs the income or not. Those distributions can increase taxable income later in life and reduce the family’s ability to control when income is recognized.
A series of partial Roth conversions before RMDs begin may reduce the balance remaining in traditional retirement accounts. Taxes are not eliminated, just redistributed. Some of the tax burden is intentionally moved into earlier years when the household may have more control over its income.
The years between retirement and the beginning of RMDs can be particularly important. A household that has stopped earning a salary but has not yet begun required distributions may have an opportunity to evaluate conversions while taxable income is temporarily lower.
Creating more flexibility in retirement
A thoughtful retirement income strategy often includes taxable accounts, traditional retirement accounts, and Roth accounts. Each is taxed differently. The variety gives a family choices.
In a year when taxable income is already elevated, Roth assets may provide a source of spending without adding another taxable traditional IRA distribution. In a lower-income year, a traditional IRA withdrawal or partial Roth conversion may make more sense.
The objective is not to avoid taxes at every opportunity. It is to have greater control over when income is recognized and which assets are used to support different goals.
Planning for a surviving spouse
Roth conversion analysis can also have a longer horizon than the current household tax return.
After the death of a spouse, household income may decline while the surviving spouse eventually files taxes as a single taxpayer. The surviving spouse may also inherit significant traditional retirement assets and face future RMDs.
A conversion that appears unnecessary while both spouses are alive may look different once projected income, tax brackets, required distributions, and the surviving spouse’s financial needs are considered.
Preparing for the next generation
Traditional retirement accounts can create an additional tax consideration when they pass to children or other non-spouse beneficiaries. Withdrawals from inherited traditional retirement accounts are generally taxable as ordinary income, and many non-spouse beneficiaries must fully distribute inherited retirement accounts within 10 years.
That can matter when heirs are in their peak earning years.
Inherited Roth accounts may also be subject to a 10-year distribution timeline, but qualified withdrawals are generally income-tax-free. Depending on the family’s circumstances, converting some traditional retirement assets during the owner’s lifetime may therefore improve the tax characteristics of the wealth eventually inherited by the next generation.
That does not make Roth assets the right legacy asset in every situation. It simply means the intended beneficiary should be part of the analysis.
Timing Can Matter as Much as the Conversion Itself
The attractiveness of a Roth conversion can change significantly from one year to another. Periods that may deserve closer evaluation include:
- The years after retirement and before RMDs begin
- A temporary decline in earned income or business income
- A year in which taxable income is unusually low
- A significant market decline
- The period before a move to a state with higher income-tax rates
- A year when sufficient cash or taxable assets are available to pay the resulting tax
A market decline offers a useful example. If investments have temporarily fallen in value, converting some of those assets may allow more of a future recovery to occur inside the Roth account. That does not mean investment decisions should be driven solely by taxes, but the opportunity can be worth evaluating as part of a broader annual review.
Lower-income years can create similar opportunities. A recently retired executive, business owner who has stepped away from day-to-day operations, or family between significant income events may have more room to recognize conversion income at a manageable tax cost.
The details still matter. A business sale, large capital gain, bonus, or other transaction can quickly change the calculation.
The Costs That Are Easy to Miss
The income tax generated by the conversion is usually the most visible cost, but it is rarely the only one. A conversion increases income for the year, which can have consequences elsewhere in the financial plan.
Medicare premiums
For someone enrolled in Medicare, a larger conversion can increase modified adjusted gross income enough to trigger the Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount, commonly called IRMAA.
Medicare generally uses income information from two years earlier to determine whether higher Part B and Part D premiums apply. As a result, a conversion can affect Medicare costs after the year in which the conversion tax itself is paid.
That does not automatically make the conversion unattractive. It does mean the additional Medicare cost should be included in the analysis rather than discovered later.
Other income-related effects
Depending on the household’s circumstances, conversion income may also affect:
- State income taxes
- The portion of Social Security benefits subject to tax
- Net investment income tax exposure
- The value or availability of certain deductions or credits
These effects are one reason Roth conversions should be evaluated using projections rather than viewed as an isolated retirement-account decision.
The source of the tax payment
How the household pays the conversion tax also matters.
Using cash or funds outside the retirement account may allow the entire converted amount to remain invested in the Roth. But those outside funds have an opportunity cost of their own.
Selling appreciated taxable investments to raise cash may create capital gains. Using business reserves can affect future business opportunities. Drawing heavily from cash may reduce the liquidity available for lifestyle needs, gifts, or other investments.
Using retirement assets themselves to cover the tax means less money ultimately reaches the Roth account. For account owners under age 59½, amounts withheld and not rolled over may also create an additional tax unless an exception applies.
The question is therefore not simply whether the family can afford the conversion tax. It is whether using those particular assets to pay it is the best use of the family’s capital.
The Better Question is Often How Much to Convert
A Roth conversion does not have to be an all-or-nothing decision. In fact, for affluent households, a multiyear strategy may be more useful than a large conversion completed all at once.
Depending on the circumstances, a family might consider:
- No conversion while continuing to monitor projected income and RMDs
- Partial annual conversions sized around a targeted tax range
- A multiyear schedule tied to retirement or other financial milestones
- A larger conversion during an unusually favorable income or market year
This approach can help keep the conversion aligned with the rest of the plan instead of allowing one transaction to create unintended consequences elsewhere.
Households with nondeductible IRA contributions also need to consider the pro-rata rule. In general, someone with both after-tax and pre-tax balances across traditional, SEP, or SIMPLE IRAs cannot simply isolate the after-tax dollars for conversion. The taxable portion is determined using the applicable IRA balances together.
That is a technical issue, but it illustrates a broader point. A strategy that looks straightforward when one account is considered by itself can look very different once the household’s complete financial picture is included.
Roth Conversions, Heirs, and Charitable Giving
Legacy planning can materially change the Roth conversion decision.
If retirement assets are ultimately intended for children or other individuals, the tax treatment of inherited traditional and Roth accounts may be important. Children who inherit traditional retirement accounts during their highest earning years may face a significant tax burden as distributions are taken.
A Roth account may provide a more tax-efficient asset for those beneficiaries, assuming applicable requirements are met.
The analysis changes when charitable giving is part of the plan.
Qualified charitable organizations generally do not pay income tax on inherited IRA distributions. For a family that expects to leave a meaningful portion of traditional IRA assets to charity, paying income tax now to convert those same dollars to Roth assets may provide less benefit.
Qualified charitable distributions, or QCDs, can also factor into the planning for eligible IRA owners. A QCD allows a qualifying distribution to move directly from an eligible IRA to a qualified charity and can satisfy all or part of an RMD when applicable requirements are met.
This can create an opportunity to be more deliberate about which assets ultimately go where.
A family might preserve some traditional IRA assets for charitable purposes while positioning other assets for a spouse, children, or grandchildren. Beneficiary designations, trusts, charitable intentions, and the estate plan should therefore be considered alongside the Roth conversion rather than reviewed separately.
The objective is not simply to leave heirs a Roth IRA. It is to determine which assets are best suited for which beneficiaries.
Five Questions Worth Considering
Before moving forward with a Roth conversion, it can be helpful to work through a few larger questions.
What will our taxable income look like over the next several years?
A single year’s tax bracket tells only part of the story. Retirement, RMDs, business income, capital gains, and other expected changes can alter the answer.
What happens if we do nothing?
Projected RMDs and future retirement-account balances provide an important comparison. Sometimes paying tax sooner may create flexibility later. In other situations, maintaining the traditional account may be the better fit.
What other costs could the conversion create?
Federal and state taxes are only part of the calculation. Medicare premiums, Social Security taxation, investment taxes, and liquidity all deserve consideration.
Who are these assets ultimately intended to support?
Assets needed for the owner’s retirement may call for a different strategy than assets intended for a surviving spouse, children, grandchildren, or charitable organizations.
Would a series of smaller conversions better serve the plan than one large transaction?
The ability to adjust from year to year can be valuable as income, markets, tax rules, and family circumstances change.
These questions are not intended to make Roth conversions seem unnecessarily complicated. They are meant to keep one tax decision from being made without considering its effect on everything around it.
A Roth Conversion Should Serve the Full Plan
Roth conversions can create meaningful flexibility for the right household. They may help manage future RMDs, diversify future sources of retirement income, support planning for a surviving spouse, and improve the tax characteristics of wealth ultimately transferred to heirs.
They can also raise current taxes, increase Medicare premiums, reduce available liquidity, or conflict with charitable and estate-planning priorities.
The important distinction is that a Roth conversion is a tool. It is not the plan.
PDS Planning approaches decisions like these as part of the broader financial picture. Projected income, tax implications, investments, retirement needs, charitable goals, beneficiary designations, estate documents, and family circumstances all contribute to the answer.
A Roth conversion may be one piece of that plan. The goal is to make sure it earns its place.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION: Please remember that past performance is no guarantee of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by PDS Planning, Inc. [“PDS”]), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from PDS. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. PDS is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the PDS’ current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request or at www.pdsplanning.com. Please Note: PDS does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to PDS’ web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly. Please Remember: If you are a PDS client, please contact PDS, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. Unless, and until, you notify us, in writing, to the contrary, we shall continue to provide services as we do currently. Please Also Remember to advise us if you have not been receiving account statements (at least quarterly) from the account custodian.
